Comments on: Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T300

By: Cam

Cam — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:33:26 +0000

Sony T300- Almost not worth buying. Screen is standard. but the functions is what i am disappointed with. Cant even print out photos with date and time, simple function but now i cant even use this camera for work. Cant even take black and white photos, yet again a simple function and it can be changed using photoshop etc but still annoying to not have that fucntion.

By: McCoullack, Ph.D. Electrical

McCoullack, Ph.D. Electrical — Thu, 08 May 2008 02:10:05 +0000

Very BAD choice of screen= LCD.
Too bad for SONY.
DSC-T300 very bad screen,
no deal.
Some reports give LCD life time
terminus at 1200 hours exposure.
That is less than 3 years, normal use.
Crystals do age, no recovery.

By: Stan

Stan — Thu, 08 May 2008 02:02:49 +0000

SONY DSC-T300 is very BAD screen=
it is a LCD screen : liquid crystal display
any temperature increase/hot /cold?
and the screen goes black-opake
untill the temperature drops past 82F’, and
ages prematurely severaly,
Very bad choice for screen/display
Camera good, but the screen gives
this T300/T200/P200/P150 the
death punch.+
There are comparable price
TFT/DSTN or STN screens, SONY
chosen not to use it, too BAD=
premature death for the screen,
and very serious mechanical
damage= total LOSS of screen
Look at the old 365 IBM lap top
computers, no fade whatsoever
since 18 years ago, full BRITHness
even today, as if the screen is NEW..
Look at the TOSHIBA what a disaster,
the screen faded away into near total
darkness, all models,
due to use of LCD.
TFT=Thin film Transistor
DSTN=Super twisted nematic
diveonz@yahoo.com
Stan, Ph.D. IEEE.
DSC-T300 is the worst.
DSC-P200 a disaster.
LSC screens are subject to heat/cold
temperature cyclings, Atomic
radiation damage, RFI, NEUTRON
burnout, Solar RADIATION EXPOSURE,
Mech damage, Magnetic reversals,
Voltage fluctuations, Solar HEAT
(INFRARED damage) etc.