Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

lx3Last update 28 September’09Firmware V2.0 Update

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 is a 10.1 megapixel digital camera and features a F2.0, 24mm Wide-Angle lens (35mm Equiv.: 24-60mm), optical images stabilization, 3 inch LCD, ISO and an ISO range from 80 – 6400. Camera dimensions are 2.34” x 4.28” x 1.06” and it weighs .5 lbs.

Overall Rating: 10 votes, average: 3.90 out of 510 votes, average: 3.90 out of 510 votes, average: 3.90 out of 510 votes, average: 3.90 out of 510 votes, average: 3.90 out of 5 Loading ... Loading ...


Reviews

Review Index – (updated 06 March’09)

Luminous Landscapes
“I was impressed with image quality, and as long as the ISO was kept in the lower end of its range, prints are clean and crisp. This is made possible on the LX3 because of its comparatively fast lens, f/2 to f/2.8, a real boon in a small sensor camera. That the LX3 offers 24mm at the wide end together with a true 16X19 aspect ratio sensor (rather than just a crop), makes it an ideal camera with casual landscape work.”
Not Rated

Digital Trends
“This is a terrific little camera that you’ll love to carry around for all types of shots. There’s no question that it’s expensive, and you should keep the ISO maxed at 400 because Panasonic cameras always have digital noise issues at high ISOs. However, this 24-60mm lens is wonderful.”
Rating:  

Cameras.co.uk
“Panasonic have put together an impressive mix of picture quality and features. I also like the design and build quality of the DMC LX3. This is a serious digital camera and is well worth close inspection.”
Rating:  

CNET
“While the Canon PowerShot G10 seems clunky in comparison and the lens isn’t quite as nice, overall I think it delivers better photo quality and the lens provides a more flexible range. But like its predecessor, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3 is a solid camera for the peripatetic photo enthusiast once you become accustomed to its quirks.”
Rating:  

Digital-Lifestyles
“The lens is pleasingly fast too, offering a bright focal ratio of f2.0-2.8, giving it at least a stop advantage over most of its rivals and offering improved performance in low light.”
Not Rated

TechRadar
“When set to face detection AF, the LX-3 can behave rather oddly. And we have found on occasion that it diligently sets about recognizing ‘faces’ in scenes that contain no such thing – the wheels of a car, the eyelets of a boat’s anchor mooring, and sunflowers, to name but three examples.”
Rating:  

DPInterface
“I’ve had no problems recommending the Panasonic Lumix LX3 to some friends and family shopping for an all-rounder digital camera and I would gladly recommend it to anyone out there as well. It’s a nice camera that you can bring around with you, satisfy most of your manual control cravings and it has decent fully automatic shooting abilities as well.”
Not Rated

DPExpert
“Panasonic deliberately constrained the pixel density on the LX3 to improve picture quality. They chose a limited zoom range in order to increase maximum aperture and resolution. The company has dared to do what serious photographers have been requesting, and they have ignored marketing focus groups. Bravo!”
Not Rated

Video Review by Popular Science

Photography Review
“The most annoying issue though is color. The manual control over white balance and color modes is nice, but I just cant’ get over the feeling that all my photos aren’t quite color correct.”
Not Rated

InfoSync
“The Lumix DMC-LX3 churned some of the best images we’ve seen in quite a while. An essential caveat with this camera is that you need to know how photography works in order to achieve the pinnacle of image quality.”
Rating:  

Trusted Reviews
“It is a superbly designed and immensely capable all-purpose compact that will satisfy any keen photographer, but is also capable of producing good results in the hands of a novice.”
Rating:  

ByThom
“It’s really the lens that’s changed the most, and fortunately the change there is mostly right on target. It’s only that linear distortion that might put off a few.”
Not Rated

Digital Photography Review (DPReview.com)
“In most other respects the images are very good – automatic correction of chromatic aberration and sensible (if rather saturated) image processing mean a lot of time spent with the LX3 is time spent thinking. It’s a camera that encourages you to play, to experiment, to take photographs and one that rewards you for doing so.”
Rating:  

Popular Science (Mini Review)
“The LX3 had the clearest low-light video, but it faltered in midday sunlight, with overexposed highlights and faded colors.”
Rating:  

TWIP
“The video quality from the LX3 is superior to the G9. This also surprised me since I always thought the G9 did a great job. The G10 actually drops some video quality compared with the G9 and in a direct comparison between the LX3 and the G10, the clear winner is the LX3 when it comes to video.”
Not Rated

Imaging Resource
“I found the 24mm wide lens a lot of fun, giving the Panasonic LX3 a slightly different personality from its closest competitors. And the quality of the images was an unqualified joy to behold. Which, in the end, is what really matters.”
Rating:  

60hzproductions (Head-to-head with the Canon G10)
“I would say this is one of the cameras to “make a statement” by going against the tide of more megapixel cameras that have inundated the market over the years. The most attractive features that it brought to the table in my book are the FAST f2.0-f2.8 lens, 24mm wide angle, HD video, and a slightly larger, 10.1 megapixel sensor.”
Not Rated

Luminous-Landscape
“This camera’s combination of high build quality, a terrific lens, wide angle coverage, a wide aperture second to none, and extensive and easy to use manual controls, makes it quite appealing to the serious photographer looking for a pocket camera.”
Not Rated

DCResource
“While it certainly doesn’t rival a digital SLR, the DMC-LX3 does deliver very good quality images for a compact camera. They have vibrant, saturated color, pleasing sharpness, low noise, and minimal purple fringing. The camera did tend to underexpose by around 1/3 stop, but that’s easy enough to fix.”
Not Rated

LaurenceKim
“I thought the LX3 would just be my casual point-n-shoot for family snapshots. I was wrong. This is a serious photographic tool. I wouldn’t hesitate to use this camera on a paying gig, particularly if I needed the use of high speed flash sync.”
Not Rated

DigitalCameraReview
“The final word in my mind is that while the LX3 outperforms many other compact cameras, it isn’t perfect. Most consumers are likely to find the cheaper point-and-shoot cameras, or even low-priced used DSLRs more appealing choices.”
Not Rated

LetsGoDigital
“Color reproduction is extremely accurate and the vivid colors offer a fresh result rich in contrast. The combination of a bright lens and an optical image stabilizer enable low ISO use which prevents the image quality from getting damaged by noise.”
Rating:  

CameraLabs
“While the image quality of the LX3 is indeed superior to both its predecessor and other Panasonic compacts, it’s by no means perfection even at its lowest sensitivity. If you’re looking, there’s still textures from noise and processing on most images, and while the LX3 outperforms models like the Canon G9 at higher sensitivities, the G9 delivers more detailed and cleaner output when both cameras are set to 80 ISO.”
Rating:  

DigitalCameraInfo
“The LX3 has excellent manual controls, expandability, and a solid feel we wish was in more point-and-shoot cameras. Yet, at the same time, it scored poor to average on most of our tests, lacks a fluorescent white balance preset, and has a poorly executed menu system.”
Rating:  

PhotoReview
“The dynamic range recorded in outdoor shots was substantially wider than average for a small-sensor digicam. Colors appeared natural and saturation was well-controlled in JPEG images.”

Pocket-lint
“Image quality is, in a word, stunning. Metering and focusing are great, detail and white balance are superb too and while the price tag looks expensive for a 10-megapixel digital compact, compared to the competition at this level, it’s still great value.”
Rating:  

CNET Australia
“One small gripe we had was the lens distortion, which was most apparent at the sides of the image. But this is a common trait for ultra-wide-angle optics, and the defects can easily be corrected on image-editing applications like the Adobe Photoshop.”
Rating:  

Lawrence Ripsher
“For the first time in an affordable compact camera, we’ve seen that megapixels are not the only way of measuring progress and that actual image quality and performance is a genuine and attainable goal as well.”
Not Rated
{category-excerpts:Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3}

Owner Feedback

Owner Feedback

[Owner Comments & Experiences]

Specs

Specifications & Camera Profile

[Camera Profile]

Firmware

Firmware Updates

Version 2.0 improvements include the addition of WB Bracketing, Exposure Compensation and AEB are now from +/- 3EV, and highlights can now also be displayed in Playback.

Press

Press Excerpt

Panasonic is pleased to introduce the DMC-LX3, the long-awaited addition to the popular Lumix LX series of high-end, compact digital still cameras.

Designed for easy, creative shooting, the new LX3 comes two years after its predecessor, the LX2, which earned an enthusiastic following among both professional photographers and serious amateurs for its exquisite image rendering, superior operating ease, and unique triple-wide system comprising wide-angle lens, 16:9 CCD and LCD. Panasonic has gone a big step further in the new LX3, upgrading every component to achieve a camera whose performance surpasses that of any compact camera that has come before. Simply put, the LX3 smashes all previous perceptions about the limitations of a digital compact camera, setting a lofty new standard in performance, quality and creative capabilities.

At the core of the LX3 is a large, ultra-sensitive 1/1.63-inch CCD developed specially for the new model. The old formula equating pixel count with image quality does not always hold true. In general, if two CCDs have exactly the same physical size but different pixel counts, the one with more pixels is not necessarily better – in fact, it’s likely to generate more picture noise, especially in low-light parts of the image. This poor low-light image quality has been a source of great dissatisfaction for compact camera users. In the LX3, Panasonic responds to this problem by boldly reversing the industry trend of pushing toward ever-higher pixel counts. Rather than cramming in the maximum number of pixels possible, it has limited the LX3′s 1/1.63-inch CCD to 10.1 megapixels. The result is a CCD that provides a generous amount of space for each pixel while offering superb sensitivity and a wide dynamic range made possible by maximizing the size of the photodiode. Panasonic also redesigned the peripheral circuits and other components to further minimize noise generation. These enhancements greatly improve imaging performance, boosting both sensitivity and saturation by around 40% compared with ordinary 10-mexapixel compact cameras.* The CCD in DMC-LX3 can reproduce images shot with the lens set from 24mm to 60mm in any of three aspect ratios; 4:3, 3:2 or 16:9, so you can always capture dynamic, richly expressive shots with a wide perspective. The newly added Multi-aspect bracketing mode allows the camera to take a image in all 3 aspect ratios simultaneously, allowing the photographer to choose the one that best takes the advantage of the scene after shooting.

{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }

BChau

I wish the lens is 28-70mm. 24mm is a bit too wide for me. 60mm is a bit too short. As for the video, it should use H.264 to encode the video for better compression. And it should have HDMI interface instead of component video interface. Still it is a very nice camera for photo and video purpose.

dalethorn

Very good design for a second camera sans zoom. I will be carrying a TZ5 for zoom shots and a LX3 for landscapes. Two compacts are much easier to carry than one large (non-pocket) camera.

Sacha van Diest

Guys,

Somewhere I found that the f of this camera is 2.0 – 2.8 , is that mean that in the zoomed mode the f still can be set to 2.8?, if yes then this camera is the most fastest lens for a compact camera, and we can have a good “bokeh” with a pocket camera :)

Regards,
Sacha

Gobbledygook

Have been using it for a week. Excellent low light shots with noise level better than most compact digital cameras on the market, including the Finepix f50FD I have used. Would have been even better if it can zoom in video mode.

dalethorn

After 10 days in use, the landscape photos are passable, but not “DSLR” quality. The macros are quite good, and there is no zoom effectively, hence many shooting opportunities are missed unless you also carry a zoom camera. The noise in dark areas is extremely low to nonexistent.

Falk

Got my LX3 yesterday. Despite heavy testing and playing with options I was not able to get better resolution or quality using RAW. Here is what I did: all contrast/sharpness/saturation/noise reduction under film mode in the LX3 settings set to minus 2 (lowest) and plus 2 (highest). Convert from RW2 to TIF using SilkyPix, sharpening and noise reduction disabled. Comparison between JPG, TIF with or without LX3-film mode settings showed differences in color, saturation, contrast, but not resolution/sharpness. RAW useless ?????

dalethorn

The LX3 is a very nice looking camera, which merits buying a deluxe carrying case. While Panasonic makes a case that’s suitable for wearing around the neck, I prefer the Leica DLux4 case for carrying on the shoulder.

uli-city

Today I wanted to buy the LX3 but then I found out that it has no HDMI interface. Why Panasonic´s engineers do not talk together?! My Panasonic plasma has the component interface on the back, the panel is hanging on the wall. How should I get connected it. HDMI is the standard of the future, why this old fashoned component interface? I will not buy the camera only of this reason and will wait for LX3 with HDMI.

Sari

It is really surprising that here in Saudi Arabia this camera is sold for US$720 whereas it is approx. 400 all around the world.

I am frustrated as I won’t be able to buy it for xmas :( !

Admin

Wow!

That price is outrageous Sari! Can’t you get someone to buy it as a gift and then have them send it to you…?

tha

i wonder what the leica dlux4 costs in saudi…

Jim

$575 in Dubai (Mall of the Emirates) on Jan 9, 2009.

Leave a Comment


nine + = 17

{ 1 trackback }