Exploring HDR (high dynamic range) photos seems to be gaining momentum in photographic circles, both professional and amateur.
HDR images present overall tone values that match the what the human eye records. Almost all digital and film cameras compromise when it comes to registering the overall tonal range of a particular scene. Until HDR anyone who has ever taken a photo understands that all cameras are limited in how much they can record.
HDR attempts to break those barriers and attempts to present images that look close to how they actually appeared in real life. Yes, it is an emerging artistic format, and yes, as more people begin to experiment with the process it will become easier for the average digital photographer to produce consistent HDR pictures.
Unfortunately, to create an HDR photo requires specialized software, Photoshop, which has a built-in HDR assembler and Photomatix a dedicated HDR software are two popular choices. There are those that believe that Photoshop is the superior HDR engine. One of the reasons is that Photoshop sophisticated tone-mapping capabilities creates more realistic looking images.
![]()
HDR Overview – A closer look
HDR imaging, otherwise known as High Dynamic Range imaging, is a technique for developing photographs that show not only what the human eye can see, but also what it cannot see, blends them together and from a single HDR image.
The HDR technique blends three or more photographs taken at different exposures or using different filters together to produce a single photograph or image that blurs the lines of reality by then tone mapping the images.
This technique oftentimes creates stunning images that appear too real to be real, but are. Some people also say that a finished product looks as if animation is coming alive.
When using the HDR photo blending technique, the photographer should use a camera that allows for manual adjustment of the exposure rate, such as one that allows the photographer to shoot in RAW mode, Auto-bracketing or auto-exposure modes.
Any other camera would simply compress all of the information with a lossy compression ratio. This type of ratio would simply “delete” some of the scene’s information, which is why most photographs taken with a cheaper camera never look like what the mind remembers the scene to be.
Using higher end cameras with RAW mode, auto-bracketing or auto-exposure modes allow the photographer to capture the most information in a single photograph, which are later blended together to form the HDR image
The finished HDR product allows the human eye to see everything there is to see from the lowlights and contrast to the highlights and shadows that would normally be invisible to the eye. The easiest way to compose an HDR image is by using Photoshop, which needs only a few simple steps.
However, to achieve the greatest quality HDR image, very specific programs, a lot of processing power is time are required because these images consist of using full size photographs in their raw format, meaning every painstaking detail is present.
To reveal these details in full color requires a very sturdy computer processor and a professional program such as Photomatrix. Users will also need to implement Photoshop. Both Photomatrix and Photoshop are recommended as the base HDR programs; optional HDR programs include Topaz Adjust and Noiseware Professional.
However, the most important thing when creating an HDR photograph or image is the scene, which the user is photographing. The best photographs to use for this HDR technique are those that are taken in extremely low or extremely high lighting conditions, meaning a normal photograph if the scene would be a waste of time because it just would not come out right.
Using the camera with auto-bracketing mode, set it to Aperture Priority, so that the HDR photographs will not contain blur spots in different areas.
Then set it to take shots at different levels of exposure, usually with one point in between. For example, most HDR photographs use -2, -1, 0, +1, and so on. Some HDR photographers also use two points in between exposures, making them -2, 0, and +2 and so on to take no less than three shots.
After taking no less than three photographs at the different exposure settings, import them into Photomatrix by converting the raw image files into .jpeg files, which work better when manually converted. It is less work for Photomatrix and they seem to process the HDR images faster.
Then, merge the images into one using the HDR image merger. Choose to align the images so to take away any shaking of the images resulting from taking the photographs by hand without a trio-pod, which is not recommended.
When Photomatrix is finished this HDR blending step, choose Tone mapping from the menu and move the sliders until the HDR photo appears “real.” Save the image and the finished result is a basic HDR photograph.
{ 14 comments… read them below or add one }
i’ve taken a few HDR photographs with a simple point and shoot camera, and used photomatix to process the images. Although the images were no where near the quality of more professionally made HDRs out there, it was still a fun and interesting experience that i encourage any serious or hobby photographer out there.
As the sample picture shows, most people totally overdo it and create, not realistic photos, but images that look like they were rendered or copied out of a video game. HDR is an interesting technology, but it should stay in the background.
photoshop cs2 being superior to photomatix ? hahaha no way… not at all, photomatix is still even superior to cs5, photomatix is specified for HDR only, photoshop is not, photomatix has but a lot more thought and options and effort into it, it has much more sophisticated tonemapping…
I’m sorry but I just don’t see the appeal of HDR photos. Sure they are artistic but most look like comic book images.
>> HDR breaks those barriers and present images that look very
>> close to how they actually appeared in real life.
They are interesting looking photographs but saying that they look closer to how they appear in real life is laughable. Their exaggerated colors look like something straight out of a video game. I agree that they are kinda cool looking, but as the article says the photos are “gaining momentum in photographic circles, both professional and amateur” so that means within a couple years this technique will be overdone and then a few years after that the photos will appear very dated.
I’m tired of HDR photos. They not only look overdone, they ARE overdone.
Just my opinion,
Ken
I’ve done my research, I’ve done my test, I’ve found maybe 100 HDR photo’s that are actually good.( This, after viewing thousands) This is my take. Ps and photomatrix are both very good programs that allow you to to some great things with your photos. However, as it states in both manuals, HDR is nothing more than photo-manipulation. This is something all photographers a guilty of at one point or another, but the HDR photos take this to a whole new level. I once owned a camera that took 3D pictures. It worked OK and did what was advertised, yet I never got a truly good picture. I shoot exclusively with a Nikon D40. 99% of my shots are done in program mode because it allows me the feel of a standard SLR camera. I have produced 5 HDR photos, and have never published one. None had the feel of a real photograph. I shoot predominately nature and I’ve found that HDR does not lend itself to the types of photos I take. To sum it up, when someone can show me an HDR that looks better than my work, I’ll become a believer. Until then, I’ll leave it to the wanna be’s.
HDR is not for everyone. On certain pictures it works really great, just as a nifty fifty works great in certain areas, and a 400mm wont. S to say that it’s not for you or you dislike it is one thing, but there could be many arguments to anything anyone has said in here.
Put simply, HDR are neat, not for everyone, and adds another dimension for a photographer to work with..
Wow
A lot of HDR bashing going on, its just another style of photography, just like Black and white photos are nothing like real life.
Get of your high horses.
HDR overdone? i still remember at school when you could spend days working on the same B&W prints, experimenting bleaching times, intentionally attempting techniques that one could thing would destroy the negative etc… “when someone can show me an HDR that looks better than my work” WOW! what a statement. I’m pretty sure that back in the days when Lillian Bassman started experimenting with a camera to latter become one of the most important photographers in fashion, a lot of people disliked her images. To say that in two years HDR will be gone… well in mho it is just another amazing technique that will bring new ideas to this amazing Photographic World.
HDR doesn’t have to be overdone – granted most of them are.
I wonder if all the HDR bashing is the defensiveness of those with $5000 cameras being challenged by the results of $100 cameras..?
I really like HDR and Tone Mapped images, it’s just another twist to photography. I found this article because of this interest, not dislike of this art form. I don’t get all the negative comments here, why does anyone go looking for stuff they don’t like just to leave negative remarks, I rather spend my time looking at what inspires me not turns me off! Live and let live I say!! Often a photograph seems to fail to live up to what is in your minds eye of a scene or event, this allows you apply those rose tinted glasses. If you like it and enjoy it then do it. I certainly will!!
I agree that there is an insane amount of HDR bashing that is really unjustified.To say that it is overdone in unjustified in the fact that EVERY type of photography digital or film, to a point is overdone by someone.Maybe thats the look they were trying to achieve? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and the artist that lays the paint.With that said it is put on display to be enjoyed or not but It gets to me when people who are not a fans of a particular style of photography routinely bash it because it does not meet their tastes.This shows just how far their appreciaition for our art really goes.I dont particularily like 90 percent of the photographs I see but I respect their individual artistic integrity.After this is all said and done I stumbled across this forum because I am actually interested in HDR photography and the potential it brings….
It is true that HDR photos can look overdone like cartoon images but then they can be presented in a number of ways like any other photograph that is post processed and perhaps the images on display here are too compressed and the HDR method or method strength settings are too strong. The final image is in the hands of the person who processes the image and tastes are very personal. HDR is not for everyone and you have to choose your subject carefully, interiors are a good candidate for HDR. For some stunning examples of what good HDR images should be like have a look at the gallery at http://www.cambridgeincolour.com , also I have posted 5 images on our website http://www.ridingmillphotographicsociety.co.uk which don’t look a bit like cartoon images. Perhaps tso2me would care to look at these sites and see if they are better than his work! I have a feeling he will be surprised.