<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fujifilm Finepix F100fd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/fujifilm-f100fd-reviews-sample-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/fujifilm-f100fd-reviews-sample-photos/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:07:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ake</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/fujifilm-f100fd-reviews-sample-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-19990</link>
		<dc:creator>ake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 01:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/fujifilm-finepix-f100fd/#comment-19990</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I got to test this thing when a friend lent it to me for a whole week. ^_^&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;pros: image quality, usable ISO even 800-1600 (makes the F50fd a cake in this category), metallic body, 5X optical zoom, SD/xD storage, OIS, face detection 3.0&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;cons: no Aperture/Shutter priority (guess we&#039;ll have to wait for a F200fd then?), oblique design a bit bulky to fit in most pockets, only 1 Mode dial (oh boy, this thing suffers the same fate as the Z100fd that I recently bought) therefore most of the camera&#039;s settings/features are cramped into one mechanism.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;higher megapixels means more noise/grain right? well this model proved that it rivals even that of the high ISO capabilities of the F30/F31fd. to anyone in doubt whether to get this camera or Canon&#039;s SD950/890, I&#039;d say go for this F100fd or Nikon&#039;s S600 if you&#039;re looking for decent high ISO quality.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got to test this thing when a friend lent it to me for a whole week. ^_^</p>
<p>pros: image quality, usable ISO even 800-1600 (makes the F50fd a cake in this category), metallic body, 5X optical zoom, SD/xD storage, OIS, face detection 3.0</p>
<p>cons: no Aperture/Shutter priority (guess we&#8217;ll have to wait for a F200fd then?), oblique design a bit bulky to fit in most pockets, only 1 Mode dial (oh boy, this thing suffers the same fate as the Z100fd that I recently bought) therefore most of the camera&#8217;s settings/features are cramped into one mechanism.</p>
<p>higher megapixels means more noise/grain right? well this model proved that it rivals even that of the high ISO capabilities of the F30/F31fd. to anyone in doubt whether to get this camera or Canon&#8217;s SD950/890, I&#8217;d say go for this F100fd or Nikon&#8217;s S600 if you&#8217;re looking for decent high ISO quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
