Comments on: Canon PowerShot G10 http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/canon-g10-reviews-sample-photos/ Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:07:01 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: eamonn http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/canon-g10-reviews-sample-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-24043 eamonn Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:39:46 +0000 http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/?p=10679#comment-24043 <p>We are in need of a compact digital with optimal flash exposure accuracy. The G10 is fantastic for other uses - but not this. The camera is to be used by nurses - some of whom clam to have no photographic know how.</p> <p>Is there anything you could suggest.</p> We are in need of a compact digital with optimal flash exposure accuracy. The G10 is fantastic for other uses – but not this. The camera is to be used by nurses – some of whom clam to have no photographic know how.

Is there anything you could suggest.

]]> By: Web Surf http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/canon-g10-reviews-sample-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-21772 Web Surf Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:33:05 +0000 http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/?p=10679#comment-21772 <p>Great outdoors at ISO 80 and 100. Rivals a dSLR.</p> <p>Lousy indoors/low light at ISO 200-800 reminds you that you need a dSLR anyway.</p> <p>Lousy small flash. I tried it with mt 530 Flash indoors and the results very very much better than the internal flash, but still not as good as even a 10D ( both at ISO 200-400 for my test)</p> Great outdoors at ISO 80 and 100. Rivals a dSLR.

Lousy indoors/low light at ISO 200-800 reminds you that you need a dSLR anyway.

Lousy small flash. I tried it with mt 530 Flash indoors and the results very very much better than the internal flash, but still not as good as even a 10D ( both at ISO 200-400 for my test)

]]>