<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/canon-ef-400mm-f56-l-usm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/canon-ef-400mm-f56-l-usm/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:07:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Quazi Ahmed Hussain</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/canon-ef-400mm-f56-l-usm/comment-page-1/#comment-43751</link>
		<dc:creator>Quazi Ahmed Hussain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/?p=11066#comment-43751</guid>
		<description>This super telephoto L lens is older than Canon DSLRs that were introduced in 2000.  The lens was born in 1993.  Surprisingly, Canon has not yet replaced this lens in 16 years .  Why?  May be because this lens is extremely popular due to its image quality and sharpness.  It has be used in good light at a wide aperture coupled with fast shutter speed (1/800 or above) plus little higher ISO if needed to capture excellent pro quality images.  Replacement possibility may include f/4 and IS.  These will make it heavier in weight but will make your wallet lighter than what it does now.  Already it&#039;s 200 dollars dearer than what is was just few months ago.  Still I&#039;m convinced it&#039;s an A grade lens which is why I&#039;ve booked one recently.  Go for it now b4 stocks are exhausted with little possibility of replenishment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This super telephoto L lens is older than Canon DSLRs that were introduced in 2000.  The lens was born in 1993.  Surprisingly, Canon has not yet replaced this lens in 16 years .  Why?  May be because this lens is extremely popular due to its image quality and sharpness.  It has be used in good light at a wide aperture coupled with fast shutter speed (1/800 or above) plus little higher ISO if needed to capture excellent pro quality images.  Replacement possibility may include f/4 and IS.  These will make it heavier in weight but will make your wallet lighter than what it does now.  Already it&#8217;s 200 dollars dearer than what is was just few months ago.  Still I&#8217;m convinced it&#8217;s an A grade lens which is why I&#8217;ve booked one recently.  Go for it now b4 stocks are exhausted with little possibility of replenishment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
