<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 12.25 Megapixel CMOS Sensor Cell Phones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/1225-megapixel-cmos-sensor-cell-phones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/1225-megapixel-cmos-sensor-cell-phones/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:07:01 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Millard</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/1225-megapixel-cmos-sensor-cell-phones/comment-page-1/#comment-22263</link>
		<dc:creator>Millard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 22:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalcameratracker.com/?p=10834#comment-22263</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is crazy. It takes a lot more than 12 megapixels to get a quality picture.  All the quality that is required to make a good photo, such as a good lens, would make the phones price prohibitive.  Why can&#039;t a phone just be a phone? Maybe they will build a phone into the latest Nikon SLR, wouldn&#039;t that make a lot of sense?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is crazy. It takes a lot more than 12 megapixels to get a quality picture.  All the quality that is required to make a good photo, such as a good lens, would make the phones price prohibitive.  Why can&#8217;t a phone just be a phone? Maybe they will build a phone into the latest Nikon SLR, wouldn&#8217;t that make a lot of sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
